Saelee v. City of Richmond et al
Kaeian Saelee |
City of Richmond and Michael Vallerga |
4:2010cv02331 |
May 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Contra Costa |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT re 28 Stipulation filed by Kaeian Saelee. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/28/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2010) |
Filing 24 ORDER re 23 Amended Document filed by Kaeian Saelee, 22 Amended Document filed by Kaeian Saelee. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/22/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010) |
Filing 20 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER re 19 Case Management Conference - Initial. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/20/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2010) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Conversion Cause of Action with Prejudice and Withdrawing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Richmond. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/25/10. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2010) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/9/2010. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/16/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/8/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.