CSWL, Inc. et al v. Higher One, Inc.
| CSWL, Inc. and Dan G. Peterson |
| Higher One, Inc. |
| 4:2010cv03177 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 3/11/2011. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
48
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/21/2011. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
45
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/18/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF re 33 Stipulation filed by Higher One, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/29/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/9/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
20
BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/1/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
