Yocom v. Grounds et al
Plaintiff: Michael Alan Yocom
Defendant: Randy Grounds, Sisk, J. Clark Kelso and Martin Siegel
Case Number: 4:2010cv03609
Filed: August 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 121 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 121 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 121 Motion for Hearing; denying 127 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 127 Motion to Amend/Correct ; ; denying 127 Motion to Consolidate Cases (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
June 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/14/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for appearance of Plaintiff at settlement conference. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011)
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER RE RETURN OF DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas, signed on 06/22/01. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011) Modified on 6/23/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
February 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 13 Motion for Leave to Appear (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011)
December 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Armstrong DENYING 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel, DENYING 10 Ex Parte Motion to Appoint Counsel (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2010) Modified on 12/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 12/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yocom v. Grounds et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Alan Yocom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randy Grounds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sisk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Clark Kelso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?