Sandisk Corporation v. Shea Integration Solutions Corp
| Sandisk Corporation |
| Shea Integration Solutions Corp |
| Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. |
| 4:2010cv03617 |
| August 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/8/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/9/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
28
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND ORDER: That attorney David W. Hansen for Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. added and attorney Douglas E. Lumish; Jill Jane Ho and Jeffrey G. Homrig are terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 01/18/11. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL: Permitting the substitution of Gary S. Fergus in place and in stead of Spencer Hosie, George F. Bishop and Bruce Wecker as counsel for Defendant/Counter-Claimant Shea Integration Solutions Corp. re 23 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 11/4/10. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
