Arrellano et al v. Vogel et al
| Lea Arrellano, Kara Nossardi, Rebecca Osborne, Ann Drucker, Karen Drucker, Carol Dineen, Estate of Lynn J. Marshall, Francis X. Marshall, Chet Marshall and Comedy Marshall |
| Lisa Vogel, We Want The Music Company, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Ford Motor Company, Inc. |
| 4:2010cv04534 |
| October 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 34 Motion to Remand and Vacating Hearing Date (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CHANGING TIME OF MOTIONS HEARINGS SET FOR DECEMBER 8, 2010 re 43 Stipulation, filed by Francis X. Marshall, Estate of Lynn J. Marshall, Ann Drucker, Comedy Marshall, Karen Drucker, Kara Nossardi, Chet Marshall, Rebecca Osborne, Lea Arrellano, Carol Dineen. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/16/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/13/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/20/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/2/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
