Whitsitt v. County of San Mateo
| Laura V. Whitsitt |
| County of San Mateo |
| 4:2010cv04996 |
| November 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Mateo |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER re 87 Joint Discovery Letter filed by County of San Mateo granting discovery requested by the County. Signed by Judge Beeler on 09/04/2012. (JUDGE BEELER, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER changing hearing time on 8/9/12. Signed by Judge Beeler on 08/06/2012. (JUDGE BEELER, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Compelling Plaintiff to appear for deposition on Thursday, August 9, 2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule Re: Motion to Withdraw 74 and Setting Hearing for 8/9/2012 at 10:30 a.m. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER by Judge Beeler granting in part and denying in part 70 Discovery Letter Brief (and ordering additional four-hour deposition of Plaintiff at Plaintiff's expense) (JUDGE BEELER, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
69
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY: Attorney Charles R Roe terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/29/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER RE 1/24/2012 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER 45 . Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/3/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER RE 12/19/2011 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER; ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ryu for Settlement. Signed by Judge Beeler on 1/20/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)
|
|
Filing
35
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 31 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.(lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/20/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/11/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/4/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM BY JANUARY 31, 2011. Signed by Judge Beeler on 1/21/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitsitt v. County of San Mateo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laura V. Whitsitt | |
| Represented By: | Charles R Roe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: County of San Mateo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
