Reynolds et al v. Hologic, Inc. et al
| Maryann Reynolds, Dana Shawa and Shella Leahy |
| Hologic, Inc. and Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. |
| 4:2011cv00462 |
| January 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER granting approval of FLSA settlement. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 09/28/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER re response to plaintiff's objections. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 09/18/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER re plaintiff's objections to proposed settlement. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 08/28/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 40 Motion for Settlement (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CLASS NOTICE AND OPT-IN FORM FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION re 32 Stipulation filed by Hologic, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/6/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/26/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/2/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/28/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
