Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. OEA International, Inc. et al
| Cadence Design Systems, Inc. |
| OEA International, Inc. and Lonestar Inventions L.P. |
| 4:2011cv00713 |
| February 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/22/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING The 5/14/12 Case Management Conference date is vacated. Compliance Hearing set for Friday 6/8/2012 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/8/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 49 Joint Case Management Statement filed by OEA International, Inc., Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Case Management Conference set for 4/23/12 is VACATED and reset to 5/14/2012 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/19/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 21 MOTION to Sever MOTION to Transfer Case. Motion Hearing set for 9/20/2011 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/15/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
