Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Centry Roof and Solar Inc.
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan, Easy Bay / North Bay Roofer Vacation Trust Fund, Bay Area Counties Roofing Industry Promotion Fund, Bay Area Counties Roofing Industry Apprenticeship Training Fund and Doug Ziegler |
Centry Roof and Solar Inc. |
4:2011cv00912 |
February 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Santa Clara |
Laurel Beeler |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER Granting 47 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/12/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2013) |
Filing 45 ORDER OF EXAMINATION: Judgment Debtor Exam set for 12/19/2012 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/5/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012) |
Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 39 Ex Parte Application FOR REFERENCE TOMAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR JUDGMENT DEBTOR EXAM. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012) |
Filing 30 ORDER INVITING PLAINTIFFS TO APPEAR BY PHONE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/30/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.