F.G. Crosthwaite et al v. River View Construction Inc.
F.G. Crosthwaite, Russell E. Burns, Operating Engineers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Pre-Apprentice, Apprentice, and Journeyman Affirmative Action Training Fund, Heavy and Highway Committee, Greg Trento, Operating Engineers' Vacation and Holiday Pay Plan and Operating Engineers Local 3 |
River View Construction Inc. |
4:2011cv00965 |
March 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Claudia Wilken |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This Order Also Terminates 19 Motion. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/2/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011) |
Filing 15 ORDER Re 13 Default. Signed by Judge Claudua Wilken on 6/16/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2011) |
Filing 10 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED WITH DEFAULT. Case Management Statement due by 9/6/2011. Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/3/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.