Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert Mendez
Defendant: R+L Carriers, Inc. and R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
Case Number: 4:2011cv02478
Filed: May 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Claudia Wilken
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 92 FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2014)
December 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken FOR 84 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, SETTING OF A FINAL APPROVAL HEARING AND APPROVAL OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2013)
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 68 MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
February 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 75 Stipulation TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 7, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MARCH 14, 2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)
January 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken REGARDING 71 REQUEST FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING DEFENDANTS 56 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART 57 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)
July 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' 56 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and PLAINTIFFS' 57 MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 56 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . Responses due by 7/31/2012. Replies due by 8/14/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/18/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2012)
May 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER REGARDING CURATIVE LETTER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/16/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 29 Motion to Compel and denying 32 Motion for Sanctions (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012)
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Granting 49 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motions due by 7/17/2012. Responses due by 8/7/2012. Replies due by 8/21/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/20/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/17/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
March 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Responses due by 3/26/2012. Replies due by 3/28/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/23/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE for Discovery purposes re 29 MOTION to Compel THE FURTHER QUESTIONING OF PLAINTIFFS RANDY J. MARTINEZ AND ROBERT MENDEZ, AND FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL TO REFRAIN FROM ASSERTING IMPROPER OBJECTIONS A ND INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO ANSWER, and 32 MOTION for Sanctions AGAINST PLAINTIFF RANDY J. MARTINEZ AND PLAINTIFF ROBERT MENDEZ, AND THEIR COUNSEL, J.D. HENDERSON, IN THE AMOUNT OF $4, 775.00 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(d)(2) AND 37(a)(5)(A) and Local Rules 37-4. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/8/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)
December 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation to File a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/20/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/2/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. R+L Carriers, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Mendez
Represented By: Marvin Edward Krakow
Represented By: Jon David Henderson
Represented By: Thomas Walker Falvey
Represented By: Michael Scott Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R+L Carriers, Inc.
Represented By: David Stuart Eisen
Represented By: Diana Marie Estrada
Represented By: Daniel Hakmo Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
Represented By: David Stuart Eisen
Represented By: Diana Marie Estrada
Represented By: Daniel Hakmo Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?