Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-58
| Hard Drive Productions, Inc. |
| Does 1-58 |
| 4:2011cv02537 |
| May 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Marin |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPORT on the determination of an action regarding Copyrights (cc: form mailed to register). (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2011) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hard Drive Productions, Inc. (Gibbs, Brett) (Filed on 9/27/2011) |
Filing 8
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Beeler on 8/15/11. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2011)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 5 PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2011)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Order re 5 Ex Parte Application For, and Memorandum of Law in Support of, Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference Ex Parte Application For, and Memorandum of Law in Support of, Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Hard Drive Productions, Inc.. (Gibbs, Brett) (Filed on 5/26/2011) |
| Filing 5 Ex Parte Application For, and Memorandum of Law in Support of, Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Hard Drive Productions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Hansmeier Declaration, # 2 Exhibit B - Gibbs Declaration)(Gibbs, Brett) (Filed on 5/26/2011) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Hard Drive Productions, Inc... (Gibbs, Brett) (Filed on 5/26/2011) |
| Filing 3 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 10/27/2011. Case Management Conference set for 11/3/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hard Drive Productions, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Does 1-58 (Filing fee $350, receipt number 34611060240). Filed by Hard Drive Productions, Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011) Modified on 5/31/2011 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/31/2011: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-58 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hard Drive Productions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brett Langdon Gibbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1-58 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
