Becerra et al v. RadioShack Corp.
| Phillip Dietro, Ariel Gonzalez, Marcus Becerra and Natalie Ciebrant |
| RadioShack Corporation |
| 4:2011cv03586 |
| July 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 78 Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Costs, Class Representatives' Enhancement and Claims Administrator Fees. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 72 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2013)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER CONTINUING SEPTEMBER 6, 2013 COMPLIANCE HEARING. The Compliance Hearing set for 9/6/2013 is CONTINUED to Friday, 9/20/2013 09:01 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/4/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 9/6/2013 09:01 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/12/13.**Please note that the Clerk's Notice, Dkt. no. 68 setting the 9/23/2013 date was ENTERED IN ERROR. The 9/23/2013 CMC date has been VACATED.*** (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
64
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/4/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT] Case Management Conference set for 1/28/2013 is CONTINUED to 2/25/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/18/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 46 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 49 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Reply due by 8/2/2012. The 8/7/2012 hearing date is vacated. Motion Hearing set for 9/11/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/30/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
45
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/30/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
41
TENTATIVE SCHEDULING ORDER Court refers and orders the parties to Private Mediation to be completed by 5/31/2012. Compliance Hearing is set for 3/23/2012 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/6/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Denying 16 Motion to Remand; Denying in part and Granting in part 8 Motion to Dismiss; Denying Motion to Strike (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/17/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/11/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
