Heatherly et al v. Malika et al
| Daren Heatherly and Irma Ramirez |
| Queen Malika, Neil B. Goodhue, Diane C. Goodhue, Tammy Otsame and Hamid Otsmane |
| 4:2011cv04125 |
| August 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 23 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and denying as moot 25 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. Case Management Conference continued to 9/25/2013 01:30 PM.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/25/13. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
20
CASE MANAAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER: Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/27/13. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2013)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER re 15 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF - REQUEST FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Irma Ramirez, Daren Heatherly Case Management Statement due by 2/20/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/27/2013 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/5/2013. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
