Gentges et al v. Trend Micro, Inc.
John Nekoranec, Leanna Nekoranec, Sharon Gentges and Marion Kersting |
Trend Micro, Inc. |
4:2011cv05574 |
November 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Saundra Brown Armstrong |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER Vacating Hearing on 54 Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Parties to submit Status Report by no later than 09/24/12. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/13/12. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012) Modified on 8/13/2012 (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/14/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 58 NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND HEARING; ORDER RE MOTION PROCEDURES. Motion Hearing set for 9/27/2012 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/26/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012) |
Filing 53 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 47 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 47 Motion to Strike (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012) |
Filing 46 ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to MOTION DUE BY 4/10/12. Responses due by 4/17/2012. Replies due by 4/24/2012.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/29/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012) |
Filing 43 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; striking 22 Motion to Strike ; striking 23 Motion to Dismiss (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.