Damian v. Northern Neon Operations LLC et al
| Guillermo Damian |
| Northern Neon Operations LLC, Giles E. Emrie and Seiler Epstein Ziegler & Applegate LLP |
| 4:2011cv06416 |
| December 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Giles E. Emrie, Seiler Epstein Ziegler & Applegate LLP, Northern Neon Operations LLC. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/25/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 4/2/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/12/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/28/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/19/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 03/12/12. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/12/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER to Submit Additional Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/03/2012. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
