The Estate of James J. Marshall v. John Varvatos of California, Inc. et al
| The Estate of James J. Marshall |
| John Varvatos of California, Inc., John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc., John Varvatos and Bloomingdale's, Inc. |
| 4:2011cv06702 |
| December 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding copyright infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012) |
| Filing 3 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 4/4/2012. Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bloomingdale's, Inc., John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc., John Varvatos of California, Inc., John Varvatos. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Bloomingdale's, Inc., John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc., John Varvatos of California, Inc., John Varvatos (Filing fee $350, receipt number 34611068670). Filed by The Estate of James J. Marshall. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
