Webster Proctor v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
Webster Proctor |
Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike USA, Inc. and Nike Inc |
4:2011cv06711 |
December 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012) |
Filing 35 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Wednesday, 8/22/2012 at 09:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by noon on Monday, 8/20/2012. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, on 08/15/12. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2012) |
Filing 27 JOINT STIPULATION AND REVISED ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, Motions terminated: 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Webster Proctor, Nike Retail Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/7/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2012) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss. The 4/3/12 hearing date is vacated. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 3 Extension of Time to Respond per Stipulation. Defendants shall file and serve their response to Plaintiff's complaint on or before February 22, 2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.