Innovus Prime LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Innovus Prime LLC
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc
Case Number: 4:2012cv00659
Filed: February 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 183
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS BETWEEN INNOVUS PRIME AND TOSHIBA re 73 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/11/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2013)
October 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 71 Joint MOTION to Continue. Case Management Conference is continued to 10/28/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/28/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER VACATING DATES re 67 Notice filed by Innovus Prime LLC. Current hearings are vacated. Parties to file a notice of dismissal within 30 days of the date of this order or to attend Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/27/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending The Date For Service of Invalidity Contentions and Claim Construction. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/23/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)
May 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 33 Motion to Strike ; denying 48 Ex Parte Application (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/26/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/3/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/29/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Innovus Prime LLC v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Innovus Prime LLC
Represented By: John Wade Carpenter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation
Represented By: Douglas F. Stewart
Represented By: Martha Corcoran Luemers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc
Represented By: Martha Corcoran Luemers
Represented By: Douglas F. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?