Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC
Defendant: A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc and Nokia Inc
Case Number: 4:2012cv01219
Filed: March 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2012 Filing 91 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 6/20/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/27/2012 01:30 PM. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)
March 12, 2012 Filing 90 Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 2:10-cv-00577. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Modified on 3/15/2012 (vlk, COURT STAFF).
March 9, 2012 Interdistrict electronic transfer to the Northern District of California. (ehs, )
February 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - Considering all of the private and public interest factors, Defendants have shown that the Northern District of California is clearly more convenient than the Eastern District of Texas. Four of the § 1404(a) factors weigh in favor of transfer, and the rest are neutral or do not apply. None of the factors weigh against transfer. As such, Defendants motions to transfer venue in the 287 Patent International Action(Dkt. No. 62); the 287 Patent International Action (Dkt. No. 20); the 474 Patent Domestic Action (Dkt. No. 36); and the 474 Patent International Action (Dkt. No. 22) are each GRANTED.. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/14/12. (ehs, )
February 9, 2012 Filing 88 RESPONSE to 85 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Supplemental Brief Addressing the Dismissal of Ricoh Innovations, Inc. and Ricoh Company, Ltd. on their Motion to Transfer Venue by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Tousi, Cameron)
February 9, 2012 ***FILED IN ERROR. FILED UNDER WRONG EVENT Document # 87, Notice. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, )
February 8, 2012 Filing 87 ***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE IGNORE.***NOTICE by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC re 85 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Response in Opposition to Defendants' Supplemental Brief Addressing the Dismissal of Ricoh Innovations, Inc. and Ricoh Company, Ltd. on Their Motion to Transfer Venue (Tousi, Cameron) Modified on 2/9/2012 (ch, ).
February 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER granting 84 Motion to Supplemental Brief Addressing the Impact of the Dismissal of Ricoh Innovations Inc and Ricoh Companu Ltd on their Motion to Transfer. Plaintiffs response is due 2/8/2012. No Reply or Sur-Reply will be permitted. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/1/2012. (ch, )
January 31, 2012 Filing 85 NOTICE by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc re 36 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (of Supplemental Brief Addressing the Impact of the Dismissal of Ricoh Entities on Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Smith, Michael)
January 31, 2012 Filing 84 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Brief Addressing the Impact of the Dismissal of Ricoh Entities on Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue re 36 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER granting 82 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Defendants shall have up to and including Friday, February 10, 2012 to serve their P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures on WRT. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/30/2012. (ch, )
January 27, 2012 Filing 82 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Serve P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures) by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting 79 Motion to Dismiss. All claims asserted in this suit between Plaintiff WRT and Defendants Ricoh are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys fees, costs of court and expenses are to be borne by the party that incurred them. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/9/2012. (ch, )
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER granting 78 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/6/2012. (ch, )
January 5, 2012 Filing 79 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss Ricoh Company, Ltd. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc. by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tousi, Cameron)
December 23, 2011 Filing 78 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery to Comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tousi, Cameron)
December 19, 2011 Case reassigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap re: misc order 11-2. Judge David Folsom no longer assigned to the case. (rvw, )
December 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER granting 76 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Deadline for WRT to make its P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 disclosures to Defendant Ricoh Innovations, Inc. is extended to December 23, 2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 12/12/2011. (ch, )
December 9, 2011 Filing 76 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery to Comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
December 5, 2011 Filing 75 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC of Initial Disclosures (Farnum, David)
December 2, 2011 Filing 74 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Google Inc Regarding Service of Supplemental Disclosures (Shvodian, Daniel)
November 28, 2011 Filing 73 Joint MOTION for Entry of Discovery and Docket Control Orders by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc, Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Discovery Order, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Docket Control Order (consolidated version), # 3 Text of Proposed Order Docket Control Order (Defendants' Version), # 4 Text of Proposed Order Docket Control Order (Plaintiff's Version))(Smith, Michael)
November 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting 70 Motion to Extend Deadline to Submit Proposed Docket Control Order and Discovery Order. Deadline is 11/28/2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 11/28/2011. (ch, )
November 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting 68 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Deadline for WRT to make its P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 disclosures to Defendant Ricoh Innovations, Inc. is extended to December 9, 2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 11/18/2011 (ch, )
November 18, 2011 Filing 70 Joint MOTION to Extend Deadline to Submit Proposed Docket Control and Discovery Orders by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc, Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
November 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 66 Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Orders. Deadline is 11/18/2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 11/17/2011. (ch, )
November 16, 2011 Filing 68 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery to Comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting 65 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Deadline for WRT to make its P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 disclosures to Defendant Ricoh Innovations, Inc. is extended to November 18, 2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 11/14/2011. (ch, )
November 11, 2011 Filing 66 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Docket Control Order and Discovery Order by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
November 7, 2011 Filing 65 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery to Comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
November 7, 2011 Filing 64 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC Pursuant to Local Patent Rules 3-1 and 3-2 (Davis, William)
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 60 Motion for Extension of Time to File Scheduling and Discovery Orders. Deadline is 11/11/2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/31/2011. (ch, )
October 28, 2011 Filing 62 REPLY to Response to Motion re 48 Cross MOTION to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit C, # 2 Errata J)(Smith, Michael)
October 28, 2011 Filing 61 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D, # 2 Exhibit E, # 3 Exhibit F, # 4 Exhibit G, # 5 Exhibit H, # 6 Exhibit I)(Smith, Michael)
October 28, 2011 Filing 60 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Docket Control Order and Discovery Order by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
October 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 58 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Sur-Reply due by 10/28/2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on October 28, 2011. (jml, )
October 26, 2011 Filing 58 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 53 Response in Opposition to Motion, 52 Reply to Response to Motion by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Defendants shall have up to and including Wednesday, October 26, 2011, to file their Sur-Reply to Plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate and their Reply to Defendants Cross-Motion to Sever. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/25/2011. (ch, )
October 21, 2011 Filing 56 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 53 Response in Opposition to Motion, 52 Reply to Response to Motion by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting 54 Joint Motion to Modify Deadlines Regarding Proposed Docket Control and Discovery Orders. ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to submit their proposed docket control and discovery orders to the Court is extended by two (2) weeks, up to and including October 28, 2011. In addition, the deadline for the Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions is extended by two (2) weeks, up to and including November 4, 2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/18/2011. (ch, )
October 14, 2011 Filing 54 Joint MOTION to Modify Deadlines Regarding Proposed Docket Control and Discovery Orders by Nokia Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
October 11, 2011 Filing 53 RESPONSE in Opposition re 48 Cross MOTION to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division; Case No. 4:10-cv-435; Oasis Research, LLC v. Adrive, LLC, et. al.; Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tousi, Cameron)
October 11, 2011 Filing 52 REPLY to Response to Motion re 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC's Reply in Support of its Motion to Consolidate filed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Tousi, Cameron)
October 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 49 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Defendants A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc.s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate. Responses due by 10/10/2011. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/6/11. (ehs, )
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MISC. ORDER 11-1 REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David Folsom for all further proceedings. Judge T. John Ward no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/3/2011. (ch, )
September 30, 2011 Filing 49 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 46 Response in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
September 27, 2011 Filing 48 Cross MOTION to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Valentine, James)
September 26, 2011 NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the 47 submitted NO CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE OR ORDER ATTACHED. Correction should be made by one busniess day (ch, )
September 23, 2011 Filing 47 ***DEFICIENT DOCUMENT. PLEASE IGNORE.***Cross MOTION to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Valentine, James) Modified on 9/26/2011 (ch, ).
September 23, 2011 Filing 46 RESPONSE in Opposition re 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Valentine, James)
September 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLCs Motion to Consolidate. Responses due by 9/23/2011. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/19/11. (ehs, )
September 16, 2011 Filing 44 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
September 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER - This case is now set for jury selection on May 7, 2014 and for a claim construction on September 17, 2013. The parties shall submit their proposed docket control and discovery orders to the court on October 14, 2011. For purposes of computing the time deadlines under the local patent rules, the court deems October 31, 2011 to be the date of the initial case management conference. As a result, the Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions is due on October 21, 2011.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/16/11. (ehs, )
September 12, 2011 Filing 42 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Erik J Dykema for Nokia Inc.(APPROVED, FEE PAID 2-694) (ehs, )
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 40 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff Wireless Recognition Technologies LLCs Motion to Consolidate Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Local Rule CV- 42(b). Responses due by 9/16/2011. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/12/11. (ehs, )
September 2, 2011 Filing 40 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Michael)
August 17, 2011 Filing 39 Additional Attachments to Main Document: 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases.. (Davis, William)
August 16, 2011 Filing 38 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
June 20, 2011 Filing 37 RESPONSE in Opposition re 36 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California filed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, William)
June 3, 2011 Filing 36 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) by A9.com Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, Nokia Inc, Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shvodian, Daniel)
May 23, 2011 Filing 35 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Clinton L Conner for Ricoh Innovations Inc,Clinton L Conner for Ricoh Innovations Inc. (APPROVED, FEE PAID 6-3327) (ehs, )
May 9, 2011 Filing 34 NOTICE of Disclosure by Nokia Inc (Initial Disclosures) (Smith, Michael)
May 5, 2011 Filing 33 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Robert F Perry for Nokia Inc. (APPROVED, FEE PAID 2-507)(ehs, )
May 5, 2011 Filing 32 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Allison H Altersohn for Nokia Inc. (APPROVED, FEE PAID 2-507) (ehs, )
March 15, 2011 Filing 31 RESPONSE to 27 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Davis, William)
March 14, 2011 Filing 30 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Nokia Inc identifying Corporate Parent Nokia Corporation, Corporate Parent Nokia Holding Inc. for Nokia Inc. (Smith, Michael)
March 14, 2011 Filing 29 ANSWER to 1 Complaint, by Nokia Inc.(Smith, Michael)
March 7, 2011 Filing 28 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amazon.com Inc identifying Corporate Parent None for Amazon.com Inc. (Shvodian, Daniel)
March 7, 2011 Filing 27 ANSWER to 1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC by Amazon.com Inc.(Shvodian, Daniel)
March 3, 2011 Filing 26 RESPONSE to 15 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant Ricoh Innovations, Inc. by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Davis, William)
March 3, 2011 Filing 25 RESPONSE to 17 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant Google Inc. by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Davis, William)
March 3, 2011 Filing 24 RESPONSE to 12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendant A9.com, Inc. by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Davis, William)
February 17, 2011 Filing 23 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. Amazon.com Inc served on 2/14/2011 by CM RRR through Registered Agent Corporation Service Company (no date given on green card, but proof of service page shows 2/14/11, answer calculated from that date, answer due 3/7/2011. (ehs, )
February 8, 2011 Filing 22 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Daniel T Shvodian for A9.com Inc,Daniel T Shvodian for Amazon.com Inc,Daniel T Shvodian for Google Inc.(APPROVED, FEE PAID 2-279) (ehs, )
February 8, 2011 Filing 21 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney James F Valentine for A9.com Inc,James F Valentine for Amazon.com Inc,James F Valentine for Google Inc. (APPROVED, FEE PAID 2-279)(ehs, )
February 8, 2011 Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark D Rowland on behalf of Ricoh Innovations Inc (Rowland, Mark)
February 8, 2011 Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew R Clements on behalf of Ricoh Innovations Inc (Clements, Matthew)
February 8, 2011 Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Google Inc identifying Corporate Parent None for Google Inc. (Smith, Michael)
February 8, 2011 Filing 17 ANSWER to 1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC by Google Inc.(Smith, Michael)
February 8, 2011 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ricoh Innovations Inc identifying Corporate Parent Ricoh Company, LTD. for Ricoh Innovations Inc. (Jones, Michael)
February 8, 2011 Filing 15 ANSWER to 1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC by Ricoh Innovations Inc.(Jones, Michael)
February 8, 2011 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available here by clicking on the hyperlink and is also on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
February 7, 2011 Filing 14 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Issued as to Amazon.com Inc. (ch, )
February 7, 2011 Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by A9.com Inc identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com Inc. for A9.com Inc. (Smith, Michael)
February 7, 2011 Filing 12 ANSWER to 1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC by A9.com Inc.(Smith, Michael)
February 3, 2011 Filing 11 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Cameron H Tousi for Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (APPROVED, FEE PAID 2-260) (ehs, )
January 26, 2011 Filing 10 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. Ricoh Innovations Inc served on 1/18/2011 by CM RRR through Registered Agent Kerin Ridout, answer due 2/8/2011. (ehs, )
January 26, 2011 Filing 9 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. Nokia Inc served on 1/18/2011 by CM RRR through Registered Agent National Registered Agents Inc, answer due 3/14/2011 per waiver entered on 1/13/11. (ehs, )
January 26, 2011 Filing 8 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. Google Inc served on 1/18/2011 by CM RRR through Registered Agent Corporation Services Co, answer due 2/8/2011. (ehs, )
January 24, 2011 Filing 7 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. A9.com Inc served on 1/15/2011 by CM RRR through Registered Agent The Corporation Service Company, answer due 2/7/2011. (ehs, )
January 20, 2011 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. Nokia Inc waiver sent on 1/13/2011, answer due 3/14/2011. (ehs, )
January 11, 2011 Filing 5 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Issued as to A9.com Inc, (Attachments: # 1 Amazon.com Inc, # 2 Google Inc, # 3 Nokia Inc, # 4 Ricoh Innovations Inc)(ch, )
December 21, 2010 Filing 4 Additional Attachments to Main Document: 1 Complaint,.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit United States Patent No. 7,856,474)(Davis, William)
December 21, 2010 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Davis, William)
December 21, 2010 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC (Davis, William)
December 21, 2010 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against A9.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc., Ricoh Innovations, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-2810340.), filed by Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 7,846,474, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, William)
December 21, 2010 Judge T. John Ward added. (ehs, )
December 21, 2010 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available here by clicking on the hyperlink and is also on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ehs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC
Represented By: William Ellsworth Davis, III
Represented By: Cameron H Tousi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A9.com Inc
Represented By: Daniel T Shvodian
Represented By: Daniel Thomas Shvodian
Represented By: Michael Charles Smith
Represented By: James F. Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc
Represented By: Daniel T Shvodian
Represented By: Daniel Thomas Shvodian
Represented By: Michael Charles Smith
Represented By: James F. Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google Inc
Represented By: Daniel T Shvodian
Represented By: Daniel Thomas Shvodian
Represented By: Michael Charles Smith
Represented By: James F. Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nokia Inc
Represented By: Allison H Altersohn
Represented By: Erik J Dykema
Represented By: Robert F Perry
Represented By: Robert F. Perry
Represented By: Cheryl A. Sabnis
Represented By: Daniel T Shvodian
Represented By: Michael Charles Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?