Khatri v. LSG Sky Chef
Prakash Khatri |
LSG Sky Chef |
4:2012cv01470 |
March 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Mateo |
Claudia Wilken |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER Granting 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Dismiss Action With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/16/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2013) Modified on 1/16/2013 (ndr, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Khatri v. LSG Sky Chef | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Prakash Khatri | |
Represented By: | Mogeeb Weiss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LSG Sky Chef | |
Represented By: | Connor Joseph Moyle |
Represented By: | Alison Le Tsao |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.