Chandler v. The United States
Plaintiff: Jo Anne M. Chandler
Defendant: The United States
Case Number: 4:2012cv01795
Filed: April 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. The Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Friday, February 28, 2014 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/26/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)
February 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 2/28/2014 09:01 AM.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/14/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF COMPLIANCE HEARING BASED ON PARTIES JOINT STATEMENT re 40 Statement, filed by Jo Anne M. Chandler, The United States. Compliance Hearing set for 1/24/2014 is CONTINUED to Friday, 2/21/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/21/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2014)
January 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/9/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/10/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER STAYING CASE UNTIL MAY 21, 2013; VACATING CASE SCHEDULING DATES AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 7/8/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/30/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2013)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER re 25 Discovery Letter Brief filed by The United States, 26 Order Setting Hearing on Motion,. Parties are ordered to meet and confer. If the parties are unable to resolve all disputes, they shall file an updated Joint Letter by May 10, 2013. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/25/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2013)
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERENCE TO EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/22/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 08/09/2012. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chandler v. The United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jo Anne M. Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?