Georgia-Pacific LLC v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Georgia-Pacific LLC
Defendant: Boise Cascade, L.L.C. and OfficeMax Incorporated
Case Number: 4:2012cv02797
Filed: May 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 233 ORDER: Re 232 Letter filed by Georgia-Pacific. Counsel to make the necessary arrangements through CourtCall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/20/2014. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDER: Re 229 Letter filed by City of Fort Bragg. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/19/2014. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2014)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AT ECF NO. 196 . Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 6/30/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDER GRANTING CITY OF FORT BRAGG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER AND DENYING GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL by Judge William H. Orrick granting 163 Motion to Amend/Correct by City of Fort Bragg and denying 164 Motion to Amend/Correct by Georgia-Pacific. City of Fort Bragg is required to E-FILE the amended answer and counterclaims by June 25, 2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTERS DATED 150 APRIL 1, 2014, 151 152 153 154 155 APRIL 2, 2014, AND 156 APRIL 7, 2014. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/17/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 148 AMENDED CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/24/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)
February 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER REGARDING JOINT DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTERS DATED JANUARY 17, 2014, JANUARY 22, 2014, AND FEBRUARY 7, 2014. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/28/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 124 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/05/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMAY JUDGMENT by Judge William H. Orrick denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2013)
September 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 121 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PRODUCTION OF INVOICES AND NON-WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE re 118 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/13/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2013)
July 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION Regarding Filing of Opposition to and Reply in Support of OfficeMax's Motion for Summary Judgment. Response due by 7/24/2013. Reply due by 8/7/2013. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/02/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/20/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/14/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
January 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 74 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ELECTRONIC PRODUCTION OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/7/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Case referred to Private ADR. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2014 10:00 AM; Pretrial Conference set for 10/16/2014 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 10/27/2014 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 10/27/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/13/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/31/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Georgia-Pacific LLC v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boise Cascade, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OfficeMax Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Georgia-Pacific LLC
Represented By: Matthew Gordon Adams
Represented By: Steven H. Frankel
Represented By: Ivor Elias Samson, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?