Provino v. Balance Staffing, Inc. et al
| Kathleen Provino |
| Balance Staffing, Inc. and Contain-A-Way, Inc. |
| 4:2012cv03051 |
| June 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, GRANTING JOINT MOTIONS TO DISMISS re 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 20, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2013)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT CONTAIN-A-WAY re 41 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Dismissing All Claims Against Contain-A-Way, Inc. dba Nexcycle filed by Contain-A-Way, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 25, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
29
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER re 28 Case Management Conference - Initial. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/14/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/4/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/11/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/24/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
