Crosthwaite et al v. C. Aparicio Cement Contractor, Inc.
| F.G. Crosthwaite, Russell E. Burns, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health & Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers and Participating Empolyers Pre-Apprenticeship, Apprentice and Journeyment Affirmative Action Training Fund, Heavy and Highway Committee and Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO |
| C. Aparicio Cement Contractor, Inc. |
| 4:2012cv04343 |
| August 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING 13 MOTION to Vacate Case Management Conference re 10 Clerks Notice, filed by Operating Engineers and Participating Empolyers Pre-Apprenticeship, Apprentice and Journeyment Affirmative Action Training Fund, Pensioned Operati ng Engineers' Health & Welfare Fund, Heavy and Highway Committee, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, F.G. Crosthwaite, Russell E. Burns, Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/10/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
