Toth v. Envivio, Inc. et al
| Michael Toth |
| Edward A. Gilhuly, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Corentin de Roy de Blicquy, R. David Spreng, Clifford B. Meltzer, Marcel Gani, Terry D. Kramer, Envivio, Inc., Julien Singes, Erik E. Miller, Gianluca U. Rattazzi, Kevin E. Dillon, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and William Blair & Company, L.L.C. |
| Joe M. Wiley |
| 4:2012cv05636 |
| November 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Mateo |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken.DENYING 32 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenGRANTING 9 MOTION TO REMAND; DENYING 14 MOTION TO RELATE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 22 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Wechkin, Robin. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 7 Stipulation Consolidating Cases and Deferring Responses to Complaints Pending Motion Practice in Connection with Removal and Remand. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
