Randle v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
Sherene Randle |
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, NA |
4:2012cv06031 |
November 28, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Jeffrey S. White |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 21 Second MOTION to Remand AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT; filed by Sherene Randle. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013) |
Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND INITIAL DISCLOSURES re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 7/10/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 5, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013) |
Filing 19 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ISSUING FURTHER ORDER RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND VACATING HEARING DATE. Motions terminated: 6 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 01/17/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2013) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 1/15/2013.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.