Cox v. Gruma Corporation
| Elizabeth Cox |
| Gruma Corporation |
| 4:2012cv06502 |
| December 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE regarding Stipulation 103 , ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/25/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2014)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 100 TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers (ygrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER RE: CONSOLIDATION. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/30/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
80
Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship to Case No. 14-cv-833 MEJ. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/26/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSIVE BRIEFING RE: RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION re 70 Letter, ORDER LIFTING STAY; the stay of this aciton is DISSOLVED. Responsive briefs filed by 1/24/2014. Rebuttals filed 1/31/2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/10/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Dismiss and for Referral to the United States Food and Drug Administration. This action is STAYED for a period of six (6) months from the date of this Order (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 65 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING FOR JUNE 11, 2013 HEARING re 37 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Gruma Corporation. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/7/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/7/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 11 Stipulation (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Gruma Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gruma Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert B. Hawk |
| Represented By: | Gregory S. C. Huffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Cox | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Michael Lopatin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
