Dector et al v. City of Rohnert Park et al
Floriberto Perez Ojeda and Pedro Dector |
City of Rohnert Park and Rohnert Park Department of Public Safety |
4:2013cv00104 |
January 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Sonoma |
Richard Seeborg |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/26/2013. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/12/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF SPECIFIED CLAIMS FOR RELIEF OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/20/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER for Dismissal of First Claim for Relief in First Amended Complaint and Agreement with Respect to Controlling Facts for Purposes of Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/26/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2013) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS CITY OF ROHNERT PARK AND ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 7/18/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/27/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.