Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lopez et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| Maria Lopez, Julio Lopez, Juana Azevedo and Bill Martin |
| 4:2013cv00111 |
| January 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
PRE-FILING ORDER PRECLUDING DEFENDANT JULIO LOPEZ FROM FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITHOUT PERMISSION OF DUTY JUDGE. Julio Lopez is precluded from filing, without advance approval of the Duty Judge, a notice of removal of the matter titled Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lopez, et al., filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. HG12618475. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 19, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT JULIO LOPEZ TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COURT SHOULD NOT IMPOSE PRE-FILING ORDER. Lopez is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than Friday, February 8, 2013, why a pre-filing order should not be issued. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 28, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
4
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 12-3040, 12-4539. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/9/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
