Fokum v. Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Fokum
Defendant: Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00811
Filed: February 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D. Laporte
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 WRIT OF EXECUTION against Defendant: Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc. in the amount of $22,263.50. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2015)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 AMENDED ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 47 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by James Fokum. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/12/2014. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2014)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 8/4/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. (granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014)
May 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING 33 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 5/21/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2014)
August 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER FOR PRETRIAL PREPARATION: Amended Pleadings due by 8/8/2013. Fact Discovery due by 3/14/2014. Motions due by 5/13/2014. Pretrial Conference set for 7/15/2014 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Jury Selection / Jury Trial (1 day) set for 7/21/2014 08:30 AM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 8/8/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013)
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re 21 Order to Show Cause, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings, Set Deadlines/Hearings Case Management Conference set for 8/7/2013 02:45 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/23/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)
July 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 7/10/2013. Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2013 02:30 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/2/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)
March 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/26/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fokum v. Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Fokum
Represented By: Ryan Scott Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Represented By: Ralph L. Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?