Morazan v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc. et al
Martha Morazan |
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Aramark Uniform Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc. and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc. |
4:2013cv00936 |
March 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND OVERRULING OBJECTION [AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT] re 72 MOTION for Final Approval of Settlement and Response to Objection filed by Martha Morazan, 59 MOTION For Service Award To Named Plaintiff Martha Morazan filed by Martha Morazan. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/15/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013) |
Filing 70 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 39 Motion to Intervene (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013) |
Filing 45 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Denying 38 Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing the Motion to Intervene (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013) |
Filing 19 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Hon. Susan Illston no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/21/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013) |
Filing 18 RECUSAL ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/20/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.