Willis v. Donahoe et al
Lovetta Willis |
Patrick R. Donahoe and John E. Potter |
4:2013cv01562 |
April 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Donna M. Ryu |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/28/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2015) |
Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 37 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. The Court VACATES the hearing set for February 11, 2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014) |
Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 25 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with Leave to File Motion for Leave to Amend. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013) |
Filing 34 NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING AND QUESTIONS FOR HEARING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/14/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2013) |
Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss; with leave to amend. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss scheduled for August 20, 2013 is VACATED. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013) |
Filing 21 ORDER: NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/15/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.