Richardson v. Fluor Corporation
Plaintiff: Timothy Ray Richardson
Defendant: Fluor Corporation and Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv01908
Filed: April 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 8/11/21014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2014)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 AMENDED ORDER FOR PRETRIAL PREPARATION. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 7/28/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 76 Stipulation FOR EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2014)
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed on 6/24/2014 by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. Granting 67 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 65 Stipulation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 Discovery Order re 58 Joint Letter Regarding Matter in Dispute Between the Parties Regarding the Rule 35 Mental Examination of Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/9/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)
May 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 PROTECTIVE ORDER re: 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Fluor Corporation, Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc., Timothy Ray Richardson. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/12/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2014)
February 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 40 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND.( 48 Order on Motion for Leave to File - striken). Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 2/5/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/26/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Fluor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Ray Richardson
Represented By: Douglas Cameron MacLellan
Represented By: Benjamin Elliott Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fluor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?