Tang v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Rock Tang |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
4:2013cv02043 |
May 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER re 14 Case Management Conference - Initial. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/2/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tang v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rock Tang | |
Represented By: | Emily Anne Knoles |
Represented By: | Daniel James Cravens |
Represented By: | Michael David Burstein |
Represented By: | Yosef Peretz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.