Kasperzyk v. Shetler Security Services, Inc. et al
| Jordan Kasperzyk |
| Shetler Security Services, Inc. and Lucasfilm, Ltd |
| 4:2013cv03383 |
| July 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 22 Defendant Shetler Security Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 33 Stipulation, filed by Shetler Security Services, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 33 Stipulation, 22 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMAR Y JUDGMENT. Responses due by 11/12/2013. Replies due by 11/19/2013. Motion Hearing set for 12/12/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/24/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
31
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/21/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER REFERRING MATTER FOR RELATED CASE DETERMINATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/17/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
16
FILED IN ERROR. Modified on 10/7/2013 (bpf, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
