Crossfit, Inc. v. Alvies

Plaintiff: Crossfit, Inc.
Defendant: Jenni Alvies
Case Number: 4:2013cv03771
Filed: August 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2014)
December 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process. Case referred to early neutral evaluation. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 12/02/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2013)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crossfit, Inc. v. Alvies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crossfit, Inc.
Represented By: Yuo-Fong Chang Amato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jenni Alvies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?