Sutta Company v. International Paper Company et al
Plaintiff: Sutta Company
Defendant: International Paper Company and Newark Group, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv05248
Filed: November 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/24/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015)
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 78 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal as to SFM, LLC dba Sprouts Farmers Markets filed by Sutta Company; re 77 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal as to The Newark Group, Inc. filed by Sutta Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 38 MOTION to Dismiss filed by SFM, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 31, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2014)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 23, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2014)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER ADVANCING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 7/16/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/23/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 23, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/11/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
April 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ALLOWING AMENDMENT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/14/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutta Company v. International Paper Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sutta Company
Represented By: Steven Edward McDonald
Represented By: James Leo Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Paper Company
Represented By: Paul S. Avilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Newark Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?