Lawanda Anderson-v-City and County of San Francisco
Lawanda Anderson |
City and County of San Francisco |
4:2013cv05555 |
December 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Donna M. Ryu |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 30 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed con sideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/30/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016) |
Filing 92 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 91 Motion to Continue. The court grants the parties' request to extend the deadline for their pretrial submissions from March 30, 2016 to April 4, 2016. The April 8, 2016 deadline for filing and serving objections and the April 15, 2016 date for the pretrial conference will not be extended. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2016) |
Filing 87 ORDER by Judge Donna M. Ryu granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 67 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 77 Motion to Amend/Correct.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016) |
Filing 82 ORDER re Request for Supplemental Information re 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The parties shall jointly file the letter with the requested information by February 8, 2016. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/3/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016) |
Filing 80 ORDER Vacating and Resetting Pretrial and Trial Deadlines; Taking Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint Under Submission; Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time, Motions terminated: 78 MOTION to Shorten Time filed by Lawanda Anderson. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/5/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016) |
Filing 75 NOTICE of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: A Settlement Conference is set for 12/16/2015 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting stipulated protective order 19 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/18/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lawanda Anderson-v-City and County of San Francisco | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lawanda Anderson | |
Represented By: | Kevin Brunner |
Represented By: | Daniel Mark Siegel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.