Barrilleaux v. Mendicino County et al
Jessica Barrilleaux |
Mendocino County, Mendocino County Superior Court, State of California and Judicial Council of California/Administrative Office of the Courts |
4:2014cv01373 |
March 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Sonoma |
Thelton E. Henderson |
Nandor J. Vadas |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 227 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/1/2018. (dmrlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2018) |
Filing 214 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu re 166 Motion for Summary Judgment and 197 Motion for Summary Judgment. Case Management Statement due by 8/29/2018. Case Management Conference set for 9/5/2018 at 01:30 PM. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2018) |
Filing 139 ORDER denying 135 County of Mendocino's administration motion to postpone deposition. Briefing schedule on 136 County of Mendocino's motion for summary judgment is stayed, pending withdrawal or stipulated revised briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/04/17. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2017) |
Filing 122 ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson denying 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2016) |
Filing 113 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 110 : Replies due by 8/5/2016. Responses due by 7/22/2016. Motion Hearing re 99 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is reset for 8/22/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Opposition due 7/22/2016; Reply due 8/5/2016. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 7/12/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2016) |
Filing 89 ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting 74 81 Motions to Strike. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2016) |
Filing 66 ORDER re: 62 Plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses. Briefing deadlines are suspended, and hearing date is vacated. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/23/15. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015) |
Filing 58 ORDER Granting Request to Appear Telephonically at Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/16/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2015) |
Filing 56 ORDER granting 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from General Order 56. Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2015. Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/09/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015) |
Filing 35 REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall file Notice of Need for Mediation by 10/23/14, if necessary. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/30/14. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014) |
Filing 31 ORDER denying 27 Plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses and ORDER requiring declarations re: General Order 56. Declarations and, if appropriate, stipulation and proposed order due by 09/29/14. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/17/14. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2014) |
Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2014). |
Filing 9 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/31/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.