Gilmore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Kevin E. Gilmore |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and NDEX West LLC |
| 4:2014cv02389 |
| May 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WELLS FARGOS 29 MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 27 APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND DENYING AS MOOT 43 MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 49 Stipulation RE NON-MONETARY STATUS OF NDEX WEST LLC. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING 12 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/29/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2014)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 12 APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND SETTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/5/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2014)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER referring Case to ADR Unit for Assessment Telephone Conference. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/27/2014. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
