Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
| Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, High Tech Computer Corp., HTC America, Inc. and BlackBerry Corporation |
| 4:2014cv02717 |
| June 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND SETTING NEW COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 5/6/2016 at 9:01 AM is VACATED and RESET for 11/18/2016 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/3/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)
|
|
Filing
102
UNSEALING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/28/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER INCORPORATING DOCKETS IN RELATED CASE AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE SAME. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/8/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying without prejudice 79 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 85 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2015)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause why case 14-cv-2966 should not be administratively terminated as duplicative of Lead Case No. 14-cv-2717 Hearing set for Friday, 4/10/2015 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 4/3/2015.Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/12/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER STAYING ACTIONS PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARINGS by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, terminating (65) Motion to Stay in case 4:14-cv-02717-YGR; granting (94) Stipulation in case 4:14-cv-03030-YGR; granti ng (121) Stipulation in case 4:14-cv-03031-YGR. Pursuant to the Stipulation to Stay Actions Pending Inter Partes review proceedings, Case Nos. 4:14-cv-3030-YGR and 4:14-cv-3031-YGR are hereby STAYED pending final exhaustion of inter partes review p roceedings.Compliance hearing set Friday, February 13, 2015 at 9:01am. Joint Statement filed five days prior. The Compliance hearing scheduled for Tuesday, August 19,2014 is VACATED.As previously ordered, Case No. 4:14-cv-2717-YGR is the lead case in this series of patent cases and all documents shall be filed in the 4:14-cv-2717-YGR docket. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/6/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting (54) Motion to Stay ; Staying Civil Action 14-cv-2966-YGR. Motion hearing set for August 5, 2014 is VACATED. Compliance Hearing set for Friday, 2/13/15 at 9:01am re submission of joint status report. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2014)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 51 Motion to Relate Cases; Setting Case Management Conference. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER RE: Conditional Transfer and Assignment of Civil Case Number. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/11/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
