Justin Lefevre v. Pacific Bell Directory et al
| Justin Lefevre |
| Pacific Bell Directory, AT&T Advertising Solutions, AT&T Interactive, AT&T Inc., YP Holdings, LLC and YP Western Directory LLC |
| 4:2014cv03803 |
| August 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William H. Orrick |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE. Motions due by 11/13/2015. The Case Management Conference set for October 13, 2015 is VACATED. The parties shall file a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement no later than November 13, 2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/9/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 41 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference continued to 6/23/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 6/3/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/21/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2015)
|
|
Filing
22
Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint within twenty (20) days of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
