Castro v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
Marley Castro |
ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Janitorial Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services - West, Inc. |
4:2014cv05359 |
December 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 15-cv-1947-DMR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/07/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2015) |
Filing 34 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 25 Motion to Remand. This action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2015) |
Filing 33 ORDER VACATING HEARINGS re 22 MOTION to Dismiss FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by ABM Janitorial Services - Northern California Inc, ABM Services Inc, ABM Janitorial Services, Inc., ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Onsite Services - West, Inc., 25 First MOTION to Remand filed by Lucia Marmolejo, Marley Castro. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/27/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2015) |
Filing 16 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/22/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.