Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
Plaintiff: Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Mediator: David Folsom
Case Number: 4:2015cv00539
Filed: February 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D. Laporte
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER Continuing Stay and Requiring Further Status Update by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)
May 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER Administratively Terminating Pending Motions by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: terminating 76 MOTION. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC
Represented By: Michael Diaz, Jr.
Represented By: Brant Collin Hadaway
Represented By: Ahmand Rashad Johnson
Represented By: Jill Fawn Kopeikin
Represented By: Valerie Margo Wagner
Represented By: Xingjian Zhao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Represented By: David C. Banker
Represented By: David M. Barkan
Represented By: Michael J McKeon
Represented By: Michael J. McKeon
Represented By: Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe
Represented By: Wasif Hasan Qureshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America Inc
Represented By: David C. Banker
Represented By: David M. Barkan
Represented By: Andrew Michael Howard
Represented By: Michael J McKeon
Represented By: Michael J. McKeon
Represented By: Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe
Represented By: Wasif Hasan Qureshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Represented By: David C. Banker
Represented By: David M. Barkan
Represented By: Michael J McKeon
Represented By: Michael J. McKeon
Represented By: Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe
Represented By: Wasif Hasan Qureshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Mediator: David Folsom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?