Hestia Education Group, LLC et al v. Arne Duncan
Plaintiff: Hestia Education Group, LLC and Manhal Mansour
Defendant: Arne Duncan
Case Number: 4:2015cv01463
Filed: March 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 95 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2016)
October 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 78 Motion for Hearing. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2016)
September 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu Re: Discovery Letter 71 and Motion for Extension of Briefing Schedule 77 . The court grants an additional two weeks for the parties to file their motions for summary judgment. Opening briefs are due Oc tober 6, 2016, opposition briefs are due October 20, 2016, and reply briefs are due October 27,2016. The October 27, 2016 hearing on motions for summary judgment is continued to November 10, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. This order does not affect the existing schedule for Plaintiffs' motion for an evidentiary hearing.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2016)
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 52 Motion for Reconsideration.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Discovery; denying without prejudice 42 Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint and Supplemental Briefing.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2016)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER requesting supplemental submission re 32 Opposition/Response to Motion filed by Arne Duncan. Response due by January 15, 2016. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/11/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hestia Education Group, LLC et al v. Arne Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hestia Education Group, LLC
Represented By: William Michael Hensley
Represented By: Catherine Simone Meulemans
Represented By: Jonathan Moran Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manhal Mansour
Represented By: William Michael Hensley
Represented By: Catherine Simone Meulemans
Represented By: Jonathan Moran Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arne Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?