William Burdt v. Whirlpool Corporation
William Burdt |
Whirlpool Corporation |
4:2015cv01563 |
April 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Jeffrey S. White |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING 32 STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to Amend Complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2015. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/29/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2015) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 30 STIPULATION To Continue Deadline To Amend Complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 9/30/2015. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/31/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015) Modified on 8/31/2015 (jjoS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 29 ORDER GRANTING 21 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 5, 2015. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2015) |
Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 27 STIPULATION To Reschedule Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/30/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2015) |
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/17/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/24/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/8/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.