Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Melvin Smith |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage |
3:2015cv01779 |
April 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER IN CIVIL CASES; AUTHORIZING DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Friday, 8/26/2016 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 8/19/2016. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/17/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2016) |
Filing 52 ORDER SETTING TRIAL SCHEDULE; VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DENYING REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AS MOOT. Case Management Statement due by 7/11/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for Monday, 7/18/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1 , 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Selection set for 1/9/2017 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. 4 Day Jury Trial set for 1/9/2017 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers . Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 10/11/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 12/16/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Compliance Hearing set for Monday, 11/21/2016 02:01 PM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Court VACATES the Case Management Conference currently set for 6/20/2016. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/16/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2016) |
Filing 44 ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ORDER REFERRING CASE to ADR for Court Mediation to be completed within 90 days of the date of this Order. Case Management Conference set for Monday, 6/20/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Compliance Hearing re parties' anticipated stipulation to a magistrate judge is set for Friday, 3/18/2016 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Joint filing by 3/11/2016.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/29/2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016) |
Filing 41 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 39 Motion to Appear by Telephone.(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2016) |
Filing 37 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016) |
Filing 34 ORDER DETERMINING CASES ARE NOT RELATED Re 15-cv-639-HSG. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/28/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2015) |
Filing 25 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCEP VACATING HEARING.Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for July 28, 2015 is VACATED until further notice. Motion to Appear Telephonically at hearing [Dkt. no 24] is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/21/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2015) |
Filing 14 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Hon. William H. Orrick no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/20/15. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015) |
Filing 5 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 15-cv-639. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/23/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.