Halpern et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| Kevin Halpern and Celluride Wireless Inc. |
| Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick, Garrett Camp, William Trenchard, Scott Belsky, Bill Gurley, Benchmark Capital, Benchmark, Founder Collective, First Round Capital, Raiser L.L.C. and Raiser CA L.L.C. |
| 3:2015cv02401 |
| May 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Copyrights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/29/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 27 STIPULATION re 23 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/17/2015. Replies due by 8/28/2015. Motion Hearing set for 9/18/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/23/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2015)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT Case Management Statement due by 8/21/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/28/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/15/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
