Jennifer Arnold v. County of Alameda et al
Jennifer Arnold |
County of Alameda and Gregory J. Ahern |
4:2015cv04083 |
September 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 40 STIPULATION DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE re docket no. 39 .(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2016) |
Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 38 Stipulation to Continue the Deadline to File a Status Report Regarding the Provisional Settlement Agreement. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2016) |
Filing 35 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 34 Stipulation re 33 Order to Show Cause. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016) Modified on 8/26/2016 (pdy, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 33 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 8/29/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/24/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016) |
Filing 32 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 15 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2016) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 21 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.